Tavis Smiley is fighting mad.
The four front-runners in the
Republican presidential race lamely cited scheduling conflicts as an
excuse to avoid the “black” debate to be held at Morgan State
University in Baltimore Thursday night. http://www.baltimoresun.com/entertainment/news/bal-to.smiley26sep26,0,5971022.story.
This leaves the debate to be carried by former Arkansas Gov. Mike
Huckabee, Sen. Sam Brownback (KS), Cong. Ron Paul (TX), Cong. Duncan
Hunter (CA), and perennial candidate and gadfly Alan Keyes. Smiley
successfully held a black debate for Dem candidates in the summer at
Howard University in which all of the front-runners participated. http://www.pbs.org/kcet/tavissmiley/special/forums/. You’ll recall I live-blogged from that event. I’m scheduled to live-blog from Thursday’s debate as well.
Well, I’m not angry at the Republican front-runners. In fact, I admire
their refreshing honesty. They are not interested in black voters.
They know that the Republican nominee, whoever he is, is unlikely to
get more than 10% of the black vote. And with a short primary season,
they don’t have the time to indulge in the empty gesture of debating
about issues of primary importance to black voters. Moreover, most of
them (Giuliani, I mean you) would be hypocrites if they stood up on the
stage at Morgan and suggested that any part of their former or future
policies would be aimed at addressing the particular concerns of
African Americans. Why should we expect these candidates to continue
the lame story peddled by the Republican Party during the past 10 years
that the Party is really, really interested in courting black voters?
What policies, advanced by the Republican Party in the last eight years
could reasonably support the idea that Party leaders understand and are
responsive to problems faced by so many blacks (e.g.,
over-incarceration based on draconian drug laws, predatory lending,
lack of health insurance, hate crimes, property tax-funded education,
voter intimidation, racial profiling, sky-high college costs, lack of
meaningful public transportation, a living wage, gun violence)? I
admit that the Dems have tried to make progressive change on only a few
of these, but the Republicans have been resistant, even hostile, to
addressing any of these issues.
Perhaps the
front-runners’ decision to dis’ the debate at Morgan signals a new
period of candor in the Republican Party. My fervent hope is that this
honesty will continue through next summer’s convention, where I hope
the Party will return to featuring Alan Jackson and the Oak Ridge Boys
as the evening talent. That way I can tune-out after the presentation
of the nominee, instead of agonizing through every night just to watch
Chaka Khan or Brian McKnight (although the deer-in-the-headlights look
on Chaka’s face while she sang “Ain’t Nobody” before the disinterested
throng of white delegates at the 2004 Convention was priceless).
I’m going to join Giuliani, McCain, Thompson and Romney in a show of
honesty. I’m not going to attend or live-blog from the debate at
Morgan on Thursday. I don’t think we’ll learn much by talking with
candidates who have no hope of even approaching the nomination. In
fact, I think we’ve learned all we need to know about a future
Republican presidency from the decision of the Party’s most viable and
popular candidates that they have better things to do on Thursday night
than focus on the interests of black voters. SOURCE OF THIS STORY
Comments Policy