BY DEWAYNE WICKHAM --- At long last, this nation is on the verge of
apologizing for its greatest sin. During separate meetings in Las Vegas
with members of the Trotter Group, an organization of black columnists,
Democratic presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama
embraced the idea of a national expression of regret for slavery.
That's a good thing. But where does it leave us? For 246 years, slavery
was a widely accepted part of the fabric of American life. The
enslavement of millions of blacks - and the neo-slavery that emerged
during the Jim Crow era after slavery was abolished in 1865 - fueled
this nation's economy for nearly three and a half centuries.
"I think an apology for slavery is a good idea to consider," Clinton,
the frontrunner for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination
said. "A number of states are now doing it ... like Virginia, the
capital of the old Confederacy. So, there is an evolution that is
taking place here."
In fact, four states - Alabama, Maryland, North Carolina and Virginia -
have formally apologized for their role in this nation's slave trade.
But so far, neither Congress nor a sitting president has mustered the
courage to do so.
CLINTON CAME CLOSEThen-President Bill Clinton came
close during a trip to Africa in 1998. During a stop in Uganda he said,
"Going back to the time before we were even a nation,
European-Americans received the fruits of the slave trade and we were
wrong in that." Hillary Clinton, the former president's wife, made it
clear she's willing to go further, if she makes it into the White
House.
"What the states are doing could be given more prominence if the
federal government were to say ... we need to do this as well," she
told the black columnists. When we met with Obama a day later, he told
us, "I could see the need for an expanded conversation about slavery
because I don't think that we've ever fully acknowledged the cost of
slavery. If I'm president, certainly I could issue an apology. But I'm
not sure ... that's what would transform the country."
NO RIGHTING THESE WRONGS A national apology for
slavery from the president and Congress could have a cathartic effect
for many black people, but it wouldn't be enough to right the wrongs
that racial inequities - the awful byproduct of slavery - have
produced. What am I talking about?
For about as long as anyone can remember, the black unemployment rate
has been double the rate for whites. Some will argue that black
joblessness is driven by a lack of education. But that doesn't explain
how in July, the unemployment rate for blacks with a high school degree
(7.3 percent) was higher than the rate for white high school dropouts
(5.9 percent). And black people whose education extends beyond a
bachelor's degree were no more successful finding work than white job
seekers who had attended college but didn't receive a degree. Both
groups had a 3.8 percent unemployment rate last month, according to the
Bureau of Labor Statistics.
NUMBERS DON'T LIEAs bad as this is, there's more that
an apology for slavery wouldn't correct. In 2005, the most recent year
for which data is available, black people with a bachelor's degree
earned $1,500 less, on average, than white high school graduates. Black
people with a master's degree earned an average $56,477 while whites
with a master's degree earned an average $69,535. And blacks with
doctoral degrees were paid nearly $12,000 a year less than whites with
the same education, according to census figures.
It's good that several states have apologized for participating in
slavery. And a formal expression of regret from Congress and the
president could help heal some of the wounds that slavery opened -
wounds that still fester. But words alone won't be enough to undo this
nation's most troubling racial inequities.
Source: The Cincinnati Enquirer
Comments Policy